Have you ever noticed how small teams seem to get things done better?

It all boils down to communication complexity.

Basically, there’s this thing called Metcalfe’s Law that says the more people you add to a network, the harder it is to communicate effectively.

And it’s not just a tech thing — it applies to teams and organizations, too.

When groups get too big, it’s tough to keep communication flowing smoothly. Our brains can only handle so many relationships at once.

Scientists say we can only maintain close connections with about 5 people, and a few less intense ones with another 15.

That’s why sports teams usually don’t have more than 15 players.

Forward-thinking organizations have realized this and moved away from traditional top-down structures.

Instead, they’ve created networks of teams that work together autonomously with less middle management.

That way, everyone can communicate and coordinate without getting bogged down.

But here’s the thing — when there’s no boss, teams have to be small enough to make sure everyone can keep up with the communication and info-sharing.

It’s all about finding that sweet spot where everyone can work together without getting overwhelmed.

thanks to @Lars Behrendt

Recent Post


There are several reasons why smaller teams can outperform larger ones in AI development:
- Faster communication and decision-making: With fewer people involved, communication is easier, leading to quicker decisions and less time wasted on approvals.
- Increased agility and adaptability: Small teams can adapt to changing project requirements or new discoveries in AI research more readily than large, bureaucratic teams.
- Stronger sense of ownership and accountability: In a small team, everyone's contribution is more visible, leading to a higher level of ownership and accountability for results.

AI projects often involve complex problem-solving and experimentation. Small teams can:
- Focus on a specific area of expertise: Team members can become highly skilled in a particular AI domain, leading to deeper understanding and innovation.
- Collaborate efficiently: Close collaboration is crucial for successful AI development. Smaller teams foster better communication and knowledge sharing.
- Reduce complexity of managing large datasets and models: Managing vast amounts of data and complex AI models can be streamlined with fewer people involved.

- Not necessarily. Large teams can become unwieldy, with communication breakdowns and slower decision-making. In AI, smaller teams with the right expertise can be more efficient at tackling complex challenges.

A team is more than just a collection of individuals. A strong team has:
- Shared goals and objectives: Everyone in the team is working towards the same vision for the AI project.
- Defined roles and responsibilities: Clear roles prevent confusion and ensure everyone contributes their strengths.
- Effective communication and collaboration: Team members work together seamlessly, sharing ideas and expertise.

Here are some key considerations:
- Assemble the right skills: Focus on finding individuals with complementary expertise in AI, data science, and potentially relevant domains.
- Foster a collaborative environment: Encourage open communication, knowledge sharing, and a supportive team culture.
- Set clear goals and expectations: Ensure everyone understands the project's objectives and their individual roles.

- Large teams can be beneficial for very large-scale projects with extensive data or requiring a wider range of specialized skills. However, for many AI projects, a smaller, well-organized team can be a recipe for success.

- Limited skillsets: With a smaller team, there may be fewer people with expertise in specific areas of AI.
- Workload management: Team members may wear multiple hats and juggle various tasks, potentially leading to burnout.

- Leverage external resources: Consider outsourcing some tasks or collaborating with external experts to fill skill gaps.
- Prioritize effectively: Focus on core tasks for the project and delegate or automate what can be.
- Maintain a healthy work-life balance: Encourage team members to manage their workloads and prioritize their well-being.

- Yes, small teams can achieve comparable or even higher levels of productivity than larger teams. Their smaller size often allows for greater focus, agility, and efficiency, enabling them to accomplish tasks more effectively.

- Small teams provide an environment where individuals feel empowered to share ideas, take risks, and experiment with new approaches. This freedom often leads to greater innovation and creativity as team members collaborate closely to solve problems and explore novel solutions.

Scroll to Top
Register For A Course